Skip to content
Mark Budman
Mark Budman

Writer

  • Home
  • Photography
  • Russian
  • Vestal Review
  • Writing
  • An Accidental American Odyssey
  • My Life at First Try
  • The Shape-Shifter’s Guide to Time Travel
  • Burning Ink Press
  • The Armor Thieves
  • My Blog: Daily Nuggets of Wisdom
  • Short, Vigorous Roots Anthology
  • The Most Excellent Immigrant
  • Lives and Deaths of Vladimir Lenin
  • The Book of All Answers
  • Instead of Death
  • Worst Purple Prose Contest
Mark Budman

Writer

On a Scale From 0 to 10

vrflash, July 12, 2017July 19, 2018

This post was updated on 7/19/18. 

 

If you read this, you are probably a writer. Most people are nowadays. All you need is a smart phone (or maybe a computer) and a dream. And every writer must be in want of a publication. You submit and then you wait. And then you get a reply.

If you expected a Yes, any No is painful, unless you were subconsciously hoping for a failure. A rejection from a publication or an agent is no different. But pain level varies, usually rated on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain you can imagine. And we, writers, are imaginative people. We feel your pain. We feel our own pain even more acutely.

I wonder if some form rejections sent by the first-rate editors or agents are written by a second-rate trial lawyer with a help of a third-rate psychologist. Maybe a sensitive author once tried to commit suicide after getting a rejection, and now they are covering their asses?

But in fact, they are so painful that they go off the scale.

Don’t despair. Please remember that this is a highly subjective industry, and what doesn’t work for me may be exactly what another agent loves. It only takes one yes to get you in the door!

They didn’t even forget the exclamation point. And they are wrong about a single yes, BTW. A manuscript needs so many yeses, especially if it’s a book.

Or

Unfortunately, after careful review, I have decided to pass on this project. This industry is incredibly subjective, and there are many agencies out there with many different ​tastes. It is for this reason that I strongly encourage you to keep submitting elsewhere in the hopes of finding an agent who will be an enthusiastic champion for you and your work.

The only thing is missing is this:

The fastest way to produce a book is to bang on the keyboard repeatedly. We encourage you to do that often, but don’t blame us for getting carpal syndrome.

Some rejections go straight for the jugular.

The volume of submissions we receive, however, makes it impossible to correspond with everyone personally.

With everyone… Don’t you feel good already? You are just a member of a vast ocean of nobodies, just another insignificant drop. Your work is no different from any other identical, putrid drops. 10 on the scale of pain.

I carefully read and consider each submission I receive. Or Thank you for giving me a chance to carefully consider your submission.

Baloney. Either you get very few submissions or you are lying about “I carefully read” or “carefully consider” through your teeth. If I gave you a chance, you blew it.  7-8 on the scale of pain.

Many agents add a twist: “Please remember this is just one agent’s opinion, and there may well be other agents who feel differently.”

Right. They are genuinely afraid that I will abandon writing after my first rejection. But wait a minute! Wouldn’t it be to their best interests if I do? Unless it was their understanding of psychology 101? Unless they were afraid that I commit suicide and my heirs would sue them? Imagine the headlines: an agent drove the writer to the brink. That was 5 on the scale of pain.

“Hi there,”

Well, my name is not There, and if it were, you’d have to capitalize it. 3 on the scale of pain.

I’m going to pass on this one because I found it didn’t spark my interest. 

Right. Why’s can’t everyone reject like that? Not sweet, but short and to the point. One might say it sparks.  2 on the scale of pain.

Or. We’re passing but thanks so much for giving us a chance here. No reason is given, but it’s inoffensive and therefore it’s also a 2.

The ideal rejection implies that your work is good or even great, but the statistics and the personal choices of the editors temporarily conspired against you.

After all, no one types a form rejection. They are either pasted or, better yet, selected from the menu.

We receive a large number of submissions but can only publish one in a hundred. Since our space is limited, we must often pass on well-crafted writing.

This one is the best. The editors don’t want to reject your outstanding opus, but they must. They are overwhelmed by the sheer number of well-crafted writing (like yours). You are still great. You are still loved. You will succeed.  Pain level 1. Almost an acceptance. Wipe your tears and soldier on.

*****************************************************************************************************

Mark rejects and gets rejections.

Uncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Related Posts

Five Points Acceptance

November 13, 2015

My 250-word flash has been accepted for publication by Five Points magazine. The publication is…

Read More

Mark’s rules of writing

May 9, 2018

Add layers. The more you have, the better. Don’t worry if some readers would miss…

Read More

What is a mensch?

March 17, 2016

What is a mensch? Mensch (Yiddish) is a person who uses a question mark at…

Read More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • An interview with me
  • Russian proverbs
  • My covid-19 vaccination
  • Short on Sugar, High on Honey
  • On writing

Recent Comments

  • vrflash on My Blog: Daily Nuggets of Wisdom
  • T. L. Sherwood on My Blog: Daily Nuggets of Wisdom
  • J. Barrett Wolf on My Blog: Daily Nuggets of Wisdom
  • Sylvia Young on My Blog: Daily Nuggets of Wisdom
  • Nina Kossman on My Blog: Daily Nuggets of Wisdom

Archives

  • June 2021
  • February 2021
  • July 2020
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015

Categories

  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Recent Posts

  • An interview with me
  • Russian proverbs
  • My covid-19 vaccination
  • Short on Sugar, High on Honey
  • On writing

Recent Comments

  • vrflash on My Blog: Daily Nuggets of Wisdom
  • T. L. Sherwood on My Blog: Daily Nuggets of Wisdom
  • J. Barrett Wolf on My Blog: Daily Nuggets of Wisdom
  • Sylvia Young on My Blog: Daily Nuggets of Wisdom
  • Nina Kossman on My Blog: Daily Nuggets of Wisdom

Archives

  • June 2021
  • February 2021
  • July 2020
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015

Categories

  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2025 Mark Budman | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes